Conversion · Payments

The card surcharge era is coming to your checkout page

On June 9, 2026, a federal judge in Brooklyn gave preliminary approval to a settlement that ends two decades of litigation over what Visa and Mastercard charge merchants to process a card. Buried in that settlement is a change that matters far more to your checkout page than the fee cut itself. for the first time, most US merchants will have the legal right to add a surcharge to specific card types, and to decline others outright. That is a checkout UX decision, not just a finance decision, and most small business sites are not ready to make it well.

The short answer

Not yet, but soon. The settlement lets merchants surcharge certain Visa or Mastercard credit transactions up to 3 percent once the rule takes effect, with mandatory disclosure at the point of entry and again at checkout. Final court approval is not expected until late 2026 or 2027, and real-world rollout through processors will likely take another 12 to 24 months after that. Use the runway now to fix how you disclose any added cost, before you are forced to.

What actually happened on June 9

US District Judge Brian Cogan granted preliminary approval to the revised Visa and Mastercard interchange settlement, a $38 billion deal covering more than 12 million US merchants and closing out litigation that started in 2005. Cogan called the deal fair, reasonable and adequate, according to Payments Dive's coverage. The headline number is a temporary cut to interchange rates, roughly 10 basis points off standard rates for five years and a capped 1.25 percent rate for standard consumer cards over eight years. That part is finance news. The part that lands on your website is the second half of the deal: the networks have to stop forcing merchants to accept every card in a brand's lineup on identical terms.

The rule change that matters more than the fee cut

For years, honor all cards meant a merchant who accepted Visa had to accept every Visa card at the same price, from a basic debit card to a super-premium rewards card that costs the merchant far more to process. The settlement breaks that link. Merchants get the right to sort cards into three buckets, commercial, premium consumer and standard consumer, and to treat them differently. That includes the right to surcharge a card type, or decline it, at either the brand level or the product level, not both at once. The cap is 3 percent of the transaction or the merchant's actual cost of acceptance, whichever is lower, and the right to do this kicks in within 90 days of the settlement's approval, per the deal's own terms.

Why this becomes a checkout-page problem, not just a finance problem

Here is the part most payments coverage skips. The settlement does not just grant a right to surcharge, it dictates how you have to disclose it. A merchant who adds a surcharge has to show it before the transaction completes, at the point of entry, meaning the storefront or the website landing page, and again at the point of sale. The surcharge then has to appear as its own line item on the receipt, not folded into a shipping or handling charge. On top of that, a merchant has to give their acquirer 30 days written notice stating the merchant's name, whether the surcharge is at the brand or product level, the amount, and any processor or facilitator involved. That is four separate disclosure and process requirements landing on a page that most small business sites currently show one flat total on.

This collides directly with the best-documented finding in checkout research. The Baymard Institute's ongoing checkout study, based on 25 rounds of usability testing and benchmarking of 344 leading ecommerce sites, puts average cart abandonment at 70.22 percent, and finds that extra costs revealed too late, shipping, tax or fees, is the single most cited reason shoppers give for walking away. A new, legally mandated surcharge line is exactly the kind of late-appearing cost that already drives abandonment today, except now it will be common enough that shoppers start expecting to see it, and punishing sites that hide it or spring it at the last screen.

How the state patchwork changes what you can even do

JurisdictionSurcharge status todayCap or note
ConnecticutBanned outrightConn. Gen. Stat. 42-133ff
MassachusettsBanned outrightMass. Gen. Laws Ch. 140D, upheld in court
MaineBanned outrightState statute bans consumer card surcharges
ColoradoAllowed with a capCapped at 2 percent
Most other statesAllowed, network rules applySubject to the 3 percent settlement cap once live
New settlement default, once effectiveAllowed at brand or product level, not both3 percent or actual cost of acceptance, whichever is lower

A national card-network rule change does not override a state ban. A merchant selling nationally still needs the checkout to detect a Connecticut or Massachusetts billing address and suppress the surcharge line for those orders, while showing it correctly everywhere else. That is a real build task for anyone using a standard hosted checkout, not a settings toggle.

What we'd do about it

Do not wait for a legal deadline to fix your cost disclosure. Move any shipping estimate, tax estimate or fee to the cart step, not the final payment screen, regardless of whether you ever add a card surcharge. That single change addresses the number one abandonment trigger Baymard has documented for years, and it is the same discipline you will need once surcharge disclosure becomes mandatory for anyone who opts in.

The timeline nobody should get wrong

Preliminary approval is not final approval. Analysts at Keefe, Bruyette and Woods expect a final decision late in 2026 or in early 2027, and that assumes no successful appeal, which is not guaranteed given how contested this settlement already is. Even after final approval, the surcharge right becoming legally available is different from every processor, point-of-sale system and payment gateway actually supporting it at checkout. Industry estimates put realistic merchant-side availability at 12 to 24 months after final approval, since it requires processor system updates and network rule updates to propagate. In plain terms, nothing changes on your checkout page this quarter. Something will change on it in 2027 or 2028, and the businesses that fix their disclosure timing now will be the ones ready to add a surcharge line cleanly instead of bolting it onto a checkout that already hides costs badly. This is exactly the kind of funnel work our conversion optimization team plans ahead of, not after, a rule change lands.

Retailers say the deal does not fix the real problem

Trade groups representing merchants are not celebrating. The Retail Industry Leaders Association and the National Retail Federation both filed objections and called the settlement, in RILA's words, a deal that enshrines rather than fixes the underlying market structure, since interchange rates snap back after the temporary cuts expire and the honor all cards changes are narrower than merchants wanted, according to RILA's June 2026 statement. Walmart, Hugo Boss, the National Restaurant Association and the National Association of Convenience Stores all filed objections in December 2025, and consumer groups objected separately. That matters for planning purposes: the surcharge right is coming, but it arrives inside a settlement its own beneficiaries think is incomplete, which raises the odds of further litigation, delay, or a second round of changes down the road. Build a checkout that can absorb a surcharge line without redesigning everything, rather than hard-coding assumptions about exactly what the final rule will say.

What we'd do about it

If you run a multi-state or nationwide store, get your fee logic out of hardcoded checkout copy now and into a rules layer keyed by billing state and card type. That is the same architecture you need for state surcharge bans today, for whatever the settlement eventually finalizes, and for any future state law that follows a different path.

Frequently asked questions

Is card surcharging legal for my business right now?

It depends on your state. Surcharging has been legal under card network rules in most states for years, subject to a cap and disclosure requirements, but Connecticut, Massachusetts and Maine ban it outright, and a few states like Colorado cap it lower than the network maximum. The settlement does not change state law, it changes what Visa and Mastercard's own network rules allow.

Does the Visa and Mastercard settlement force me to add a surcharge?

No. It creates a right to surcharge or decline certain card types, it does not require any merchant to use that right. Whether it makes sense depends on your margins, your customer base and how much friction you are willing to add to checkout for a fee offset.

When does the card surcharge settlement actually take effect?

Preliminary approval was June 9, 2026. Final approval is expected late 2026 or in early 2027, and even after that, processor and point-of-sale support is expected to take 12 to 24 months to reach most merchants. Nothing changes on your checkout page immediately.

What has to appear on my checkout page if I do surcharge a card?

Under the settlement terms, the surcharge must be disclosed before the transaction completes, shown at the point of entry such as your website's landing or product page, shown again at checkout, and listed as its own line item on the receipt. It cannot be folded into shipping or handling.

Does the settlement apply to debit cards?

The settlement's surcharge provisions are specifically about certain Visa and Mastercard credit card categories. Debit card surcharging remains governed by separate, generally stricter rules and state law, and merchants should not assume the same 3 percent allowance applies.

What should I do before the surcharge rule is finalized?

Fix the timing of your cost disclosure now, independent of surcharging. Show shipping and tax estimates at the cart step, not the last screen of checkout, and build your fee logic so it can be turned on or off by state without a redesign. That protects conversion today and makes you ready for whatever the final rule says.

The takeaway

Do not treat this as a future problem you can ignore until a processor forces your hand. The settlement is real, it is moving through federal court right now, and the surcharge right it creates is going to show up on a lot of competitors' checkout pages before yours if you wait. The businesses that win here are not the ones that add a surcharge first. They are the ones that already disclose costs honestly and early, because that habit is what the new rule demands anyway, and it is what already costs you sales today, settlement or no settlement.

Sources & further reading

Rahul Gupta

Founder of HyberX, a digital growth agency working with brands across the US, Europe, the Middle East and India. Writes on web design, paid media and conversion optimisation.

More about Rahul · LinkedIn

Related reading

Want your checkout ready before the rules change?

We will audit how and when your site discloses shipping, tax and fees, and fix the parts that are already costing you conversions today.

Book a Growth Call