Ship in weeks, not quarters
At pre-seed and seed the site's job is to exist, be specific and be credible. A three-month process to launch a site you will rewrite after your next ten customer conversations is the wrong trade.
The most expensive startup site is the beautiful one built around positioning that changed six weeks after launch.
Startup website design in San Francisco costs $4,000 to $20,000 depending on stage. Before Series A the goal is not a definitive site, it is one that ships quickly, says something specific, and can be rewritten by your own team the week the positioning moves. Building for permanence at this stage wastes money.
At pre-seed and seed the site's job is to exist, be specific and be credible. A three-month process to launch a site you will rewrite after your next ten customer conversations is the wrong trade.
Investors and early customers are reading for what you do and who it is for. A plain page that says something precise outperforms a beautiful one that says something universal, and it is dramatically cheaper.
Positioning changes at this stage constantly. If every headline edit is an agency ticket, the site is stale within a quarter. We build so a founder can rewrite the homepage on a Sunday.
A custom design system, a blog you will not maintain, six use case pages before you know the use case, an animated hero. We will say so, because we would rather build the next thing for you than the wrong thing now.
Bay Area hiring is competitive and engineers read the careers page carefully. Team, what you are building, how you work and what the stack is. It is frequently the second most visited page on a startup site.
Analytics, event tracking on the actions that matter and a clean structure to add pages against. Retrofitting measurement after you have traffic means the first months of data are gone.
| Project | Range (USD) | Timeline | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed launch site | $4,000 to $8,000 | 2 to 4 weeks | Home, product, about, careers, contact, editable by your team, analytics |
| Seed stage site | $8,000 to $15,000 | 4 to 7 weeks | Above plus use cases, blog, deeper product content, design system basics |
| Series A rebuild | $15,000 to $30,000 | 8 to 14 weeks | Full component system, multi-audience structure, migration, performance |
| Rewrite only | $1,500 to $4,000 | 1 to 2 weeks | New positioning applied to the site you already have |
| Support retainer | $500 to $3,000 per month | Ongoing | Pages, changes, testing, monitoring |
If you are pre-product and unsure of the positioning, spend at the bottom of this range. The money is better kept for the rebuild you will want once you know who is buying.
| Ask them | A good answer sounds like | Walk away if |
|---|---|---|
| What does this actually cost? | A range, and what moves it, before a call | You must book a call to learn the ballpark |
| Who owns the code and the repository? | You do, in your own account, from day one | Ownership depends on staying on a retainer |
| Can I see Core Web Vitals on three live sites? | URLs, and an honest word about the slowest | They show you portfolio shots |
| Who maintains this after launch? | A named arrangement and response time | Not discussed until it breaks |
In a market where your buyer is frequently technical, an agency that will not answer these in writing has told you something.
| Mistake | What it costs |
|---|---|
| Building for positioning you have not proven | A rewrite six weeks after launch |
| A three-month process before revenue | Time that mattered more than the site did |
| Every edit requires the agency | A homepage frozen at last quarter's story |
| A blog nobody will maintain | Three posts and a stale date that reads badly |
| No careers page | Losing engineers to companies that wrote one |
| Analytics added after traffic arrives | The only months of data that would have taught you something |
Pre-seed, $4,000 to $8,000 and ship it in a month. Seed, $8,000 to $15,000. Series A rebuilds run $15,000 to $30,000. Spending more before the positioning is proven usually funds a rewrite rather than a result.
Two to four weeks for a focused launch site if you can make decisions quickly and the content is ready. The constraint is almost never the build, it is how long a founding team takes to agree what the product actually is.
It will, which is why we build so your team can rewrite it. Headlines, sections and pages editable without a developer, so the story on the site matches the story you told in yesterday's sales call.
Only if someone will actually write. Three posts and a stale date does more damage than no blog at all, and at this stage founder time is usually worth more in customer conversations than in publishing.
A custom design system, use case pages before you know the use cases, elaborate animation and a content programme nobody owns. We would rather tell you that now than sell you the larger project.
Earlier than most founders expect. Bay Area engineers read it closely, and team, mission, how you work and what the stack is will do more hiring work than a job board listing does.
Yes to both. Plenty of good early stage sites start from a strong template and get the positioning and build right instead. We will tell you honestly when custom design is not where your money should go.
No. We work with Bay Area startups remotely on overlapping Pacific hours and would rather state that than imply otherwise. Not carrying Bay Area overheads is part of why our numbers differ.
Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.