Capability in numbers, not adjectives
Materials, tolerances, sizes, volumes, lead times and equipment on the floor. An engineer is checking whether you can make the part, and precision manufacturing described as high quality tells them nothing.
A Chicago manufacturer's website is evaluated by an engineer looking for a tolerance, and most of those sites answer with a brochure.
Manufacturing website design in Chicago costs $6,000 to $45,000. The buyer is usually an engineer or a sourcing specialist who needs specifications, tolerances, materials and capacity before they will make contact, which makes structured technical content the entire job rather than a section of it.
Materials, tolerances, sizes, volumes, lead times and equipment on the floor. An engineer is checking whether you can make the part, and precision manufacturing described as high quality tells them nothing.
A datasheet nobody can search, index or read on a phone does none of the work specification content should do. On the page, structured and filterable, with the PDF available as well.
Buyers type a number from a drawing, an old catalogue or a competitor. Partial matches, superseded numbers and alternate formats all have to work, or they assume you dropped the line.
Material, quantity, tolerance, drawing upload and timeline. A generic contact box sends everything to an estimator; a proper RFQ form sends only what can actually be quoted, which is what your team is short of.
ISO, AS9100, ITAR registration, material certifications. Sourcing specialists filter on these before making contact, so they belong in structured content rather than a logo strip in the footer.
Midwest manufacturing competes hard for skilled trades. A careers section that shows the floor, the equipment and the shift structure does real recruiting work that a job board listing does not.
| Project | Range (USD) | Timeline | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focused capability site | $6,000 to $13,000 | 4 to 8 weeks | Home, capabilities, industries, quality, careers, RFQ form, editable |
| Product and specification site | $13,000 to $28,000 | 8 to 15 weeks | Above plus structured product data, specification tables, search, downloads |
| Larger or integrated site | $28,000 to $60,000 | 14 to 26 weeks | Catalogue at scale, ERP or quoting integration, multi-audience paths, migration |
| Product data project alone | $4,000 to $18,000 | 3 to 8 weeks | Extraction, structuring, specifications, certifications, ongoing sync |
| RFQ and qualification flow | $2,000 to $7,000 | 1 to 4 weeks | Structured form, drawing upload, routing, notifications |
| Care plan | $250 to $1,500 per month | Ongoing | Updates, new products, content, monitoring |
The variable that moves these numbers most is how much of your product data already exists in a usable format. That is the first thing we scope and it decides the rest.
| Ask them | A good answer sounds like | Walk away if |
|---|---|---|
| Price each integration separately | A line and a number per system | Integrations listed as one bullet |
| How will our product data get on the site? | A named source, a format, a sync method | We will copy it across |
| What does this cost? | A range, and what moves it, before a call | You must book a call to hear a number |
| Who owns the code and the repository? | You do, in your own account, from day one | Ownership ends when the retainer does |
In a market this industrial, the data question separates the field. An agency that has not asked where your catalogue lives has not scoped the project.
| Problem | What it costs |
|---|---|
| Capability described in adjectives | An engineer who cannot tell if you can make the part |
| Specifications only inside PDFs | Nothing searchable, filterable or indexed |
| Search fails on a drawing number | A buyer who assumes you dropped the line |
| Generic contact form instead of RFQ | Estimator hours spent on work you would decline |
| Certifications only as footer logos | Filtered out before anyone contacts you |
| No careers content | Losing skilled trades to the shop that wrote some |
A focused capability site runs $6,000 to $13,000. A product and specification site with structured data runs $13,000 to $28,000. Larger integrated sites run $28,000 to $60,000.
Numbers. Materials, tolerances, sizes, volumes, lead times and what is on the floor. They are checking whether you can make the part, and capability described as high quality or precision answers nothing.
On the page, structured and filterable, with the PDF available as well. A datasheet nobody can search or read on a phone does none of the work that specification content should be doing.
Qualify in the form. Material, quantity, tolerance, drawing upload and timeline. Volume drops and what reaches your estimator becomes quotable, which is the trade every busy shop wants.
In structured content rather than as logos in the footer. Sourcing specialists filter on ISO, AS9100 or ITAR registration before they make contact, so being unfindable on those is being removed from the list.
Yes, through structured product content driven from your existing data rather than hand-built pages. Where that data lives and what shape it is in is the first thing to scope because it decides most of the build.
More than most manufacturers expect. Midwest shops compete hard for skilled trades, and a careers section showing the floor, the equipment and the shift structure does real recruiting a job listing does not.
No. We work with Chicago manufacturers remotely on Central hours and would rather say that than imply otherwise. Not carrying local overheads is part of why our numbers differ.
Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.