An interior design or architecture website is a portfolio, and portfolios fail on two things: image weight that makes them unusable on a phone, and no budget signal, which produces enquiries from clients who were never in range. Project pages that rank need to be pages, not a gallery grid with no text.
01Heavy imagery that still loads
This is the defining technical problem of the category. Modern formats, correct sizing, lazy loading below the fold, and never lazy loading the first image. Done properly a portfolio can be image-rich and fast; done carelessly it is neither.
02Project pages, not a gallery grid
A grid of images with no text ranks for nothing. Each project needs a page: brief, constraints, what you did, materials, area, location and duration. That text is what makes the project findable.
03A budget signal
Interior projects range enormously and enquiries from people expecting a fraction of your rate waste everyone's time. A per-square-foot range, a minimum project size, or an indication of typical spend filters early.
04Scope stated plainly
Design only, design and execution, turnkey. Clients frequently do not know the difference until it becomes a dispute, and stating it removes a category of problem before it starts.
05Enquiries with the right detail
Property type, area in square feet, location, timeline and rough budget. Short enough to complete, specific enough that your first call is useful rather than qualifying.
06Credibility for a large spend
Registration where applicable, years, completed project count, named clients where permitted. Someone about to spend significantly on their home is checking whether you are real.