A real page per practice area
Not a paragraph in a list. What the matter typically involves, how it proceeds, what it costs, what the client should expect and what the alternatives are. This is what ranks and it is what convinces.
Every San Francisco firm has a practice areas page. Almost none has a page good enough to rank for the thing a client is actually searching.
Law firm website design in San Francisco costs $4,000 to $30,000 depending on firm size. What separates a site that generates matters is depth: a substantial page per practice area rather than a list, attorney pages that carry real credentials, and intake that qualifies before an attorney's time is spent.
Not a paragraph in a list. What the matter typically involves, how it proceeds, what it costs, what the client should expect and what the alternatives are. This is what ranks and it is what convinces.
The State Bar governs what a firm may publish, including claims, testimonials, results and required disclosures. Your firm decides what applies; we build the site to carry it correctly and keep the required wording where it belongs.
Admissions, education, reported matters, publications and speaking. In a market with this much legal talent, the attorney page is frequently the page that decides the call, and a two-line bio wastes it.
Matter type, jurisdiction, timing and whether there is a conflict. A generic contact form sends everything to an attorney; a structured one sends only what is worth their time and improves response speed on the rest.
San Francisco firms serve a client base that is unusually comfortable with self-service. Clear process, published fee structures where possible and content that treats the reader as capable will outperform formality here.
Anything a prospective client types deserves careful handling. Where enquiries are stored, who can read them and what the retention policy is are questions to answer during the build, not after an incident.
| Project | Range (USD) | Timeline | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo or small firm | $4,000 to $9,000 | 4 to 6 weeks | Home, six to ten practice pages, attorney pages, intake, schema |
| Mid-size firm | $9,000 to $20,000 | 6 to 12 weeks | Above plus deeper practice structure, industry pages, insights section |
| Larger firm | $20,000 to $40,000 | 12 to 20 weeks | Multi-practice structure, attorney database, CMS migration, search |
| Practice area page | $500 to $1,200 each | 1 to 2 weeks each | Research, attorney interview, copy, build, schema |
| Care plan | $250 to $1,200 per month | Ongoing | Updates, content, attorney changes, monitoring |
The gap between firms is content depth rather than design budget. A firm with twelve substantial practice pages beats a beautiful site with a list every time.
| Ask them | A good answer sounds like | Walk away if |
|---|---|---|
| What does this actually cost? | A range, and what moves it, before a call | You must book a call to learn the ballpark |
| Who owns the code and design files? | You do, unconditionally, in the contract | Ownership depends on staying on a retainer |
| Can I see Core Web Vitals on three live sites? | URLs, and an honest word about the slowest | They show you portfolio shots |
| Who maintains it after launch? | A named arrangement and response time | Not discussed until it breaks |
An agency that will not put these in writing has answered the question anyway.
| Problem | What it costs |
|---|---|
| Practice areas as a bulleted list | Nothing ranks and nothing convinces |
| Two-line attorney biographies | The page that decides the call, wasted |
| Generic contact form | Attorney hours spent on matters you would decline |
| No indication of fees or structure | Calls that end at the first mention of cost |
| Required disclosures handled loosely | A compliance problem you did not need |
| Enquiries stored without a policy | A confidentiality question with no answer |
A solo or small firm runs $4,000 to $9,000. A mid-size firm with deeper practice structure runs $9,000 to $20,000. Larger firms run $20,000 to $40,000.
The State Bar governs what a firm may publish, including claims, testimonials, results and required disclosures. Your firm decides what applies to your practice and we build the site to carry it correctly. We are not your ethics advisor.
One substantial page for each area you genuinely want matters in, and none for areas you do not. Six strong pages beat twenty thin ones, and thin pages actively dilute the ones that would otherwise rank.
Subject to the rules your firm operates under, which govern testimonials, results and the disclaimers required alongside them. Confirm what applies with your own advisor and we will build the pattern to carry the wording.
Where the rules and your practice allow, structure helps more than it hurts. Clients in this market expect to understand how they will be billed, and firms that explain it get fewer calls that end at the first mention of cost.
Qualify in the form. Matter type, jurisdiction, timing and conflict information means an attorney only sees what is worth their time, and the rest can be routed or declined quickly rather than sitting in an inbox.
Somewhere you have chosen deliberately, with a retention policy and a defined list of who can read them. It is worth deciding during the build rather than discovering the answer during an incident.
No. We work with Bay Area firms remotely on Pacific hours and would rather say that than imply otherwise. Not carrying Bay Area overheads is part of why our numbers differ from local agencies.
Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.