Whether you are real at their scale
Corporate procurement checks whether you can handle their size before anything else. Team, years, sectors served, named clients where permitted, and process documented. Vagueness here ends the evaluation quietly.
Gurugram buyers compare you against companies with far larger marketing budgets. The gap is closed with specificity, not with production values you cannot match.
Gurugram concentrates corporate services, consulting, fintech and D2C brands, and the buyers there apply a higher credibility bar than most of NCR. You will not outspend the multinationals on production. You can beat them on specificity: named people, real numbers, published process and answers to the questions their sites avoid.
Corporate procurement checks whether you can handle their size before anything else. Team, years, sectors served, named clients where permitted, and process documented. Vagueness here ends the evaluation quietly.
You cannot outspend an MNC on photography and video. You can publish what they will not: what things cost, how long they take, what is excluded, and what happens when something goes wrong. Buyers notice the difference.
Named people with real credentials, published thinking, and a clear account of how engagements work. In this sector the individuals are the product and most sites hide them behind a corporate we.
Security posture, compliance position and data handling stated plainly, because your buyer's procurement team will ask. Getting this on the site removes a round of questions before the first call.
Cyber Hub-adjacent D2C is a real segment here. Those need Shopify done properly, fast product pages and a checkout tested on the phones customers actually use.
Code, design files, domain, hosting and analytics on final payment, unconditionally, and not conditional on a retainer.
| Problem | What it signals |
|---|---|
| Corporate language with no specifics | You are hiding scale or capability |
| No named people on the site | There is nobody accountable |
| Stock photography of a foreign office | Undermines every other claim |
| No pricing or engagement model | Procurement cannot even shortlist you |
| Case studies without numbers | The results may not exist |
| No security or compliance detail | A blocker for fintech and enterprise buyers |
| Ask them | A good answer sounds like | Walk away if |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns the code and files? | You do, unconditionally, in the contract | Ownership depends on staying with them |
| Can I open three sites you built? | Live URLs you can check yourself | Screenshots and a portfolio PDF |
| What is explicitly not included? | A written list with change pricing agreed | Everything is included, which means nothing is defined |
| How will we know it worked? | A metric agreed before work starts | They report activity rather than outcome |
The exclusions question is the one most people forget, and it decides whether the final invoice matches the quote.
A video shoot you can barely afford reads as a stretch. Clean typography, real photographs and specific writing read as confidence, and cost far less.
Prices, timelines, exclusions, what you decline. Larger firms cannot commit to these publicly, which is exactly why it differentiates you.
You will not win the broadest corporate searches. You will win specific service and sector terms, where the multinationals publish nothing of substance.
Anything from a few thousand rupees for a template to several lakh for a custom build. What decides value is inclusions, ownership and who is accountable afterwards, so compare like for like by asking every bidder to quote the same page count and inclusions.
Not on production values. On specificity: published prices, timelines, exclusions, named people, real numbers and answers to the questions their sites avoid. Larger firms cannot commit to those publicly, which is why it works.
Named people with real credentials, published thinking that demonstrates how you approach problems, and a clear account of how an engagement works. In consulting the individuals are the product, and most sites hide them behind corporate language.
Security posture, compliance position and data handling stated plainly, plus the usual credibility signals. Your buyer's procurement or risk team will ask, and answering on the site removes an entire round of questions.
Yes. For D2C brands the work that decides revenue is product pages, checkout and speed on mid-range phones rather than the visual design, which is where most attention goes.
For narrower service and sector terms, realistically yes, because the larger firms publish little of substance on those. For the broadest corporate terms you are competing against much larger budgets and long-established domains.
You do, on final payment: code, design files, domain, hosting and analytics, unconditionally. Get it in writing from anyone you shortlist.
Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.