Delhi NCR

Website speed optimisation in Delhi measured on the phones people use.

Most speed advice is a list of thirty things. This is the order that fixes the most, and how to tell which one your site is stuck on.

Overview

What actually makes Indian business sites slow

The fastest route to a faster site is usually image compression and sizing, removing unused third-party scripts, caching with a CDN, then fixing render-blocking CSS and fonts. On most Indian business sites those four account for the majority of load time, and hosting response time is the fifth. Measure with Search Console field data, not a Lighthouse screenshot.

01

Images straight from a phone

A 4000 pixel photograph displayed at 800 is the single most common cause we find. The browser downloads all four thousand pixels. Modern formats and correct sizing routinely halve page weight in an afternoon.

02

Third-party scripts nobody reads

Analytics, tag manager, chat widget, heatmap, two ad pixels and a review widget. Each runs on your visitor's device. Audit what you load and remove what informs no decision. This is the highest return per hour of any speed work and costs nothing.

03

Cheap shared hosting

If the server takes 800 milliseconds to send the first byte, no front-end work rescues the page. Time to First Byte under 600 milliseconds is a reasonable target, and a lot of low-cost Indian hosting cannot reach it under load.

04

Page builders

Elementor, Divi and similar ship large CSS and JavaScript payloads on every page regardless of what the page contains. Sometimes the honest answer is that the builder is the problem.

05

No CDN

Serving every asset from one origin server to visitors across India adds latency you do not need to pay. A CDN is cheap and helps almost every site.

06

Fonts that block rendering

Four weights of two families, loaded in a way that leaves text invisible while they download. Subset, self-host, use font-display swap, preload the one that matters.

What to avoid

The order we work in

StepTypical gainEffort
Compress and resize imagesLargeLow
Remove unused third-party scriptsLargeLow
Caching and a CDNMedium to largeLow
Fix render-blocking CSS and fontsMediumMedium
Defer or split JavaScriptMediumMedium
Better hostingMediumLow effort, some cost
Rebuild the front endLargeHigh

Work top down and stop when you hit the target. Teams that start at the bottom spend the most and often finish slower than teams that did the first three properly.

Detail

What to ask before you hire

Ask themA good answer sounds likeWalk away if
Who owns the work and files?You do, unconditionally, in the contractOwnership depends on staying with them
Can I see three live examples?URLs you can open and check yourselfScreenshots and a portfolio PDF
What is explicitly not included?A written list with change pricing agreedEverything is included, which means nothing is defined
How will we know it worked?A metric agreed before the work startsThey show you the visuals again

The last question is the one that separates most of the field, because answering it commits them to a number.

Comparison

Measuring it properly

Lab dataField data
Where fromPageSpeed Insights, LighthouseChrome User Experience Report
What it isOne simulated load from a data centreReal visitors over 28 days
Feeds rankingNoYes
Good forDebugging a specific pageKnowing whether you actually pass
Common mistakeTreating the score as the goalIgnoring it because the score looked fine

This is the source of most arguments between a business owner and their developer. Both are looking at real numbers that measure different things. The one tied to ranking is in Search Console.

FAQ

Common questions

Why is my website slow?

On most sites we audit it is oversized images first, third-party scripts second, and hosting third. A page builder is often a contributing fourth. The fix order matters, because starting with the expensive options usually produces less improvement than starting with images.

What is a good page load time?

Aim for Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5 seconds on mobile, measured on real visitor data rather than a simulated test. Total load time is less useful because it includes work that happens after the page is usable.

Will a caching plugin fix it?

It helps and it does not fix an oversized image problem or twelve third-party scripts. Caching reduces server work. It does nothing about what the browser has to download and execute once the page arrives.

Is my hosting the problem?

If Time to First Byte is above roughly 600 milliseconds, largely yes, and better hosting is usually the cheapest meaningful improvement available. If TTFB is already low, hosting will change very little.

Does site speed affect Google rankings?

Yes, modestly. Core Web Vitals are part of page experience and act more as a tiebreaker than a primary factor. The stronger argument is commercial: slow pages lose visitors before they see anything, which shows up in conversions long before rankings.

Do I need to rebuild the site to make it fast?

Rarely. Most sites reach acceptable numbers through images, script removal, caching and font loading. A rebuild is justified when the weight comes from the theme or page builder itself, which is common on builder-based sites.

How long does speed work take?

One to three weeks for most sites, and you usually see the largest improvement in the first few days from images and scripts alone. Field data in Search Console takes about four weeks to reflect the change, which is why teams often think a fix failed when it has simply not aggregated yet.

How do I know it worked?

Compare Core Web Vitals field data in Search Console before and after, allowing four weeks for the rolling window. Also watch bounce and conversion on your busiest mobile pages, because that is where the commercial effect shows up.

Next step

Tell us what you need.

Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.