Separate indexable pages
Each language needs its own URL that search engines can crawl and index. A widget that swaps text on the fly produces one indexable page, so you get no search visibility in the second language at all.
A translate button is not a multilingual website. It produces nothing indexable, reads as machine output, and earns you no search visibility in the second language.
A genuinely multilingual site needs separate indexable pages per language, hreflang tags so search engines serve the right version, a switcher that keeps you on the same page, and copy written in each language rather than machine-translated. A translate widget delivers none of these.
Each language needs its own URL that search engines can crawl and index. A widget that swaps text on the fly produces one indexable page, so you get no search visibility in the second language at all.
Tags telling search engines which version serves which audience, with correct language and region codes and reciprocal references. Misconfigured hreflang is worse than none because it sends conflicting signals.
Machine-translated pages read as machine-translated to native speakers, and they trigger the quality concerns Google's guidance describes. Professional translation, or someone in-house who writes well in the language.
Hindi search terms are frequently not direct translations of the English ones. Translating your English keywords produces pages targeting phrases nobody searches, which is a common and expensive assumption.
Switching language should keep you on the same page, not dump you on a homepage. This sounds minor and it is one of the most common complaints from users of bilingual sites.
A genuinely bilingual build adds real work: duplicate structure, translation, testing in both languages. We price it openly rather than quoting a monolingual number and revising later.
| Translate widget | Proper multilingual | |
|---|---|---|
| Indexable pages | One | One per language |
| Search visibility in language two | None | Yes |
| Translation quality | Machine | Written |
| hreflang | Not possible | Configured |
| Cost | Almost nothing | Real work, priced |
| Suits | Convenience for existing visitors | Actually reaching a new audience |
A widget is fine if the goal is convenience for people already on your site. It does nothing if the goal is being found by people searching in another language.
| Ask them | Good answer | Walk away if |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns the site and accounts? | You do, in your own name | Accounts in the agency's name |
| Can I open three live examples? | URLs you can check yourself | Screenshots and a PDF |
| What is explicitly not included? | A written list with change pricing | Everything is included |
| How will we know it worked? | A metric agreed before work starts | Activity reports |
The exclusions question decides whether the final invoice matches the quote.
Only for convenience. It does not create separately indexable pages, so you get no search visibility in the second language, and machine output reads as machine output to native speakers. If the goal is reaching a new audience, it does not work.
Tags telling search engines which language version serves which audience. You need them for any genuinely multilingual site, and misconfigured hreflang is worse than none because it sends conflicting signals.
Only with separate indexable pages, correct hreflang and genuine keyword research in Hindi. Hindi search terms are often not direct translations, so translating your English keywords targets phrases nobody actually searches.
A genuine second language typically adds 30 to 40 percent, covering written translation, duplicate page structure, hreflang and testing in both languages. We price it openly rather than burying it.
Not necessarily. Translate the pages that matter to the second-language audience and leave the rest in one language. Partial is fine as long as hreflang correctly describes what exists.
Often better and cheaper, if the person genuinely writes well in the language rather than just speaking it. Written translation is a different skill from fluency, and readers can tell.
Send us what you are trying to fix and we will tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether we are the right people for it. If we are not, we will say so.